自動翻訳機能に関して

この自動翻訳機能はPC上のChromeまたはIEで機能します。Safariまたはスマホでは機能しない可能性があります。

This automatic translation feature works on PC browsers such as Chrome or Internet Explorer. It may not work on Safari or on smartphones or tablet devices.

Sinful Science

Is Scientific Technology Evolution Sin?

Reference pages: / True Science / Fallen Physics / The Dark of Mega-Solar /

In the blockbuster movie Terminator 2, questioning the fate of a scientist who was perusing technological advancement without considering good or evil

If asking any question to the latest sophisticated AI (Artificial Intelligence) that is said that it shall come out quite objective no emotional realistic correct answer. And questioning about “Sin of advancement of science and technology” the answer is indeed that quite understandable sense and very realistic as mentioned below (This is AI states judgement and objective statement including AI’s judgement about good achievement or sin by AI itself);

The phrase “Sin of advancement of science and technology” focuses on the negative aspects and ethical issues brought about by science and technology. This question is controversial, as scientific progress has brought great benefits to humanity, but also brought about unexpected problems and the possibility of misuse.

The “sin” side of scientific progress:

Environmental issues: The development of science and technology is placing a growing burden on the environment, including global warming and environmental pollution caused by the use of fossil fuels.
Weapons development: The malicious use of scientific knowledge, such as nuclear and biological weapons, could lead to the destruction of humanity.
Ethical challenges: In the fields of life sciences and artificial intelligence (AI), new issues have arisen that cannot be resolved by traditional ethical standards, such as genome editing and AI decision-making criteria.
Social disparities and a surveillance society: While advances in IT have brought convenience, there are also concerns about widening inequality due to the digital divide and the rise of a surveillance society.

The “Benefits” of Scientific Advances:

On the other hand, science and technology also play an essential role in human happiness and social development, such as extending lifespans through medical advances, improving lifestyle convenience, and disaster prevention.

The conclusion:

Science itself must be a neutral body of knowledge, and how its results are used is left to human ethics and social responsibility. It is important for researchers and society as a whole to discuss “ethical, legal, and social issues” (ELSI) from the early stages of technological development and to build an appropriate social framework.

Science & Technology’s absolute Policy

Science itself must be a neutral body of knowledge absolutely.

It means that science theory itself can create scientific hypothesis free limitlessly in limitless imagination. But there could be occurred often major contradictions or conflicts between some scientific theories. In case that sort of scientific theories against to other scientific theory occurs, it is necessary to sincerely Identify the causes of the conflict, clarify the reason why of the contradiction, and bring together the relevant more realistic theory or evidence and logic to achieve consistency.

In the process of achieving consistency, it is absolutely necessary to avoid distorting the facts based on past hypotheses or authority.otherwise never overcome such any contradictions, never create “new theory” and no hope to find “new discovery” and “any progress”.

So many of hypotheses theory may birth inexhaustibly, sometime they are called “fiction” or “dream”, but it naturally can never make egoistically new rules, formulas, or theories as “science” from any theories of hypotheses. And even any firm scientific theory is not allowed to criticize or deny other scientific theory from one side point of view. In particular, there is often a large discrepancy between the practical results of physics and mathematics.By digitizing numbers and mathematics, even complex calculations can be processed at high speed, so it would be only natural that the divergence from physical phenomena will also increase dramatically.

All scientific definitions and formulas are hypotheses, and no scientific theory can completely guarantee the physical results in the always changing natural environment by law of nature that occur in reality. This is why, no matter how advanced or complex science and technology must be required physical experiments showing essential mechanism. There is no scientific logic that can deny logic that has been empirically reproduced in reality, and such irrational negative logic is undoubtedly scientifically defined as a “evil theory(So as to say Sin)“.

Even if any firm established scientific theory that became lack of neutral position is no longer just an “unscientific” theory, but also an absurd and “sinful slanderous theory”. For example, if a judge lacks neutrality and makes a ruling arbitrarily beliefs by applying inappropriate law, the trial shall be unconstitutional and shifted to other trial of subject, and the judge shall be removed from the court at same time, if any damage caused by its ruling was confirmed state shall compensate that, and the same logic of rule shall be applied for science claim.


In any case, the moment this neutral perspective is lost even in the science & technology field, mostly critical damage will occur, and it shall occur damage by criminal. “The Sinful Scientific Technology Evolution” becomes, which is why in recent years such crimes have been closing up to judge in the field of Criminology.

Anything other than true science should be to be said a “Sinful Egoistic Science”

The present major problems caused by egoistic scientific theories that should be reviewed by The True Science

The serious problems listed below are all actual physical damage and serious losses in the public society caused by the arbitrary application of scientific technological theories that lack neutrality and the abuse of hypothetical theories. Even when defining scientific solutions to solve these problems, other new demands of technological development is driven by the same arbitrary application of technological logic and the abuse of hypothetical logic, and so naturally, the scientific and technological challenges that need to be solved become more complex and grow, setting off a vicious cycle.
However, from the perspective of scientists, engineers, and experts involved in scientific and technological development, the more technological challenges increase and become more complex, the more demand there is for technological development to solve them, and this contributes to a cycle of wealth for those in these positions. As a result, the forces that prevent and prevent problems from arising work is not functional, and going into situation like stop thinking the Irreparable damage and problems are actually occurring and being left unattended.

This is truly a human’s Sin, and the fact proofs that “the perpetrators” are none other than the scientists and experts regarding such those technologies.

The theory that CO2 is the root cause of all evils in global warming and climate change

Basic physics clearly shows that climate change, global warming/boiling are caused not by the CO2 emitted when things are burned, but by the increase in air pressure due to the massive generation of water vapor (moisture:H2O) gas produced when boiling water. Furthermore, despite scientific evidence that other gases, such as methane, contribute far more to global warming than CO2, why is CO2 singlehandedly considered the root of all evil? Why are we destroying forests, which absorb CO2, while simultaneously increasing CO2-producing machinery and power generation? Why is there conflict around the world over the rights to CO2-producing petroleum resources? This situation can only be explained by a egoistic scientific argument for allocating huge budgets to the development of nuclear power, which does not emit CO2. Nuclear power generation cannot stop easily once it begins to work, and safety measures require enormous counter measure costs, necessitating the irrefutable expenditure of further investment for technological development that brings strong motivation in the mind of the scientists, experts, and investors involved with which their desire boosts it all by means. While there are so many new technologies regarding nuclear power under development which of some of those are unrealistic technologies including merely hypothetical theories there as so many. And in spite of that huge budgets allocated for them, the actual operational date is still more than a decade away, with no clear timetable.

But the more it becomes clear that it proofs completely no match from an economic science perspective, and as a result, there is a trend back towards oil, and the debate over CO2 emissions is beginning to tone down. Indeed, various scientific theories have lost their direction, occurring considerable financial damages such as like fail of EV shift and many of renewable energy systems like considerable negative chain reaction with which that incidents are clearly shown as expanding and spreading.

The “big lie” about hydroelectric power generation efficiency

According to the power generation efficiency figures published by electric power companies for various power generation systems, and its public comments says that as follows;

The energy conversion efficiency of hydroelectric power is extremely high at approximately 80%, which is far superior to other power generation methods (thermal power approximately 30-40%, solar power 15-20%, wind power approximately 25%, etc.), and is characterized by its extremely high ability to convert the energy contained in water into electricity. This high efficiency is supported by the weight of water, abundant water resources, and the high performance of water turbines (92-95%).

However, in that public comment, the 80% of efficiency rate is obviously doubtful in common sense and scientific theory and there is no clear scientific physical calculations shown like hidden on purpose.
Hydroelectric power generation is powered by storing large amounts of water from natural rain and snow in high-altitude dams, then dropping that water from high altitudes to turn turbines and generate electricity. The power source is nature’s water cycle, specifically its natural pumping force and gravity, which are free of charge. So if comparing to other combustion-based power generation systems, the efficiency is so high due to free of power source that it’s no exaggeration to call it “perpetual motion machine power generation”.
However, in terms of that the mechanism of the generation, the “fundamental physics theory,” it’s well-known that the potential energy of large amounts of water stored at high altitudes is converted into torque energy that drives a water turbine, and that torque energy then rotates a generator to generate electrical energy. And according to well-known the physical calculations, the potential energy of an object weighing 1 kg and located 1 meter high is calculated to be 9.8 watts. If the potential energy of a massive volume of water stored approximately 100 meters high could be converted to electrical energy with 80% efficiency, a simple calculation would show that it could generate more electricity than 10 nuclear power plants. This is simply unrealistic. Furthermore, when converting the linear kinetic energy of a vertically falling volume of water into rotational energy, there is a conversion loss of 36% over a 90-degree rotation, and a whopping 84% over a 360-degree rotation in undeniable basic physical calculation. Furthermore, mechanical frictional resistance in the turbine and generator, as well as magnetic flux loss in the generator, are always 10 to 20%, so it is clear that the known conversion efficiency of hydroelectric power generation only takes these losses into account. If the conversion efficiency from potential energy to electrical energy were calculated using basic physical calculations that show the actual situation, it would clearly be less than 10%.

Anyone familiar with physical science would immediately recognize this as a false statement such like 80% of efficiency, but hydroelectric power was the main source of electricity before the development of thermal power, and it was just that there is no meaning to point out about such things already in the past after that the construction of dams required enormous costs and imposed a heavy burden on the environment. Furthermore, because the operating costs of existing dams and power generation facilities are not commensurate with the cost of generating electricity to supply to society, utilization rates have fallen and new construction has stoped.

Mega solar power plant system (“The Dark Side of Mega Solar Power Generation“)

As for like a representative of regenerable clean energy source Solar Panel Generation System, certainly has great generating function with very thin and rational physical structure is very wonderful in science technologies. However, that wonderful feature has ruined all its merits by implementing at larger scale up to be able to generate higher instantaneous power as much as called Mega-Solar at same time. For detail about “Sin of Mega Solar Power Plant” is to be refer this.

Will the evolution of AI technology lead to real economic development?

Even if AI could win at Shogi or Chess to human, AI would have the creativity to create games like Shogi or Chess? . Could an AI-created virtual baseball player with even greater abilities than real Shohei Ohtani earn more money in a virtual reality baseball game than the real Shohei Ohtani? Absolutely not, because his real performance is unbelievable beyond common sense not imaginable even in fiction. And no one would pay money for such an unrealistic virtual reality game software but pay for seeing the real game.

The emergence of generative AI like ChatGPT, which are easy for anyone to use, surprised the world. But it would be a starting of typical negative spiral with full of contradiction on the name of advance of science technology. Because human as the user must have much more practical knowledges based on physical reality, higher judgement power and emotional intelligence to master that than AI has consequently. Otherwise, no one can judge the answer from AI whether if it is right or wrong so no one can take responsible of the judgements for and that would cause and trigger further another problems and incidents, and goes more complicated. And consequently that society will inevitably fall into extreme chaos as people lose sight of the humanity rules that everyone should follow and lose sight of order. However, Physics, thermodynamics, chemistry, bio logical physics and all other sciences have proven that AI and Autonomous Robots cannot possibly match the physical energy consumption efficiency of humans. Therefore, mathematics and economics have also proven that they cannot take away jobs from humans or reduce labor costs. So why are the AI ​​and robotics industries in the spotlight, the stock prices of related companies rising, and huge amounts of capital being poured into them? The principle of non-malicious egoistic pursuing technology and its financial motivation is at work. However, because AI and robots consume enormous amounts of electricity, if the energy crisis worsens, they do not match to general economic principles, and will have no use other than as weapons of war.

Many economic analysts and experts have stated that one day the bubble will suddenly burst for sure in a few years. And it would be obvious who will lose out at the time.

In that sense, the “Gravity Reactor(重力リアクター)” could even be the savior of the AI ​​industry ironically.

Slander against “Gravity Reactor(重力リアクター)” disguised as scientific logic and and the agitation to avoid it that encourages

Gravity Reactor(重力リアクター) technology is a new, other dimensional technology on primitive natural science of the function discovered and invented by a completely different approach, the polar opposite of the highly complex advanced science and technology of the past. The basic principle is quite simple and functioning to convert simply infinite gravitational energy into infinite rotational motive energy even that working principle is following law of conservation of energy, and it all makes sense for all scientific law. However, such this engine technology of which the power drive system composed in extremely rational simple physical structure utilizing great power of nature is unimaginable better or worse, beyond the world of science fiction or virtual, when such so the outstanding functionality was reproduced in reality and in which not at least be found any concrete factor to deny in its principle, The new technology should have been worth to rewrite the history of human science & technology at huge impact. But naturally, such so big gap of image or such opposite value of sense is not allowed to be recognized and accepted easily. And it is even shunned and hated by current scientific and technological authorities and their vested interests. However, in accordance with the neutral policy of science & technology, regarding authorities and expertises must never criticize, deny, or silence for a proven and reproducible technology without confirming it actually, no matter how far different from original familiar scientific theory.

Because, the occasion to rewriting scientific history is obviously supposed to be nothing less than “the evolution of science. It is also self-evident that there should be no scientific theories that hinder evolution.

For example, in sports events such as the Olympics, when breaking a world record attracts attention to that sport and contributes to its revival. While it is understandable for the previous record holder to make sarcastic remarks or nitpick, any attempt to interfere with participation in the competition is a serious criminal offense.

In particular, in today’s human society, which is facing an energy crisis, this concerns the lives of billions of people, and could even lead to charges of complicity in the crime of genocide.

Furthermore, when searching for the keyword “Gravity Reactor(重力リアクター)” on Google, the AI’s summary explanation changes frequently, and it is clearly always focused on expressions that cast doubt on the credibility of the technology, and the explanations are clearly arbitrary and lack neutrality. This is an act that denigrates the evolution and reliability of AI technology, and is a despicable act that is tantamount to openly spreading crime with another crime, akin to a terrorist act.


Tehno-Criminology

Study of Crime causing by evolution of science & technology

Criminology is an academic field that scientifically studies the causes of crime, the psychology and behavior of criminals, the impact of crime on society, and crime prevention and countermeasures (punishment, rehabilitation, victim support, etc.). It integrates a wide range of fields, including psychology, sociology, law, and statistics, to elucidate crime phenomena from multiple perspectives and explore practical solutions.

Main Research Subjects and Contents

Causes of Crime: We explore multiple factors, including individuals (psychological and biological factors), society (poverty, discrimination, education), and the environment (regional characteristics).
Criminal Behavior: We analyze the motivations and processes that lead people to commit crimes using psychological methods.
Criminal Justice System: We study the entire law enforcement and judicial process, including police, trials, punishment, corrections (prisons), and probation.
Crime Prevention and Countermeasures: We develop policies to deter crime, criminal rehabilitation programs, victim support, and community safety measures.

Main Research Subjects and Contents

Science itself is a neutral body of knowledge, and how its results are used is left to human ethics and social responsibility. It is important for researchers and society as a whole to discuss “ethical, legal, and social issues” (ELSI) from the early stages of technological development and build appropriate social frameworks.


Translate »