Physics is a science that attempts to elucidate the mechanisms, properties, and laws of natural objects and phenomena by observing them. Physics is a branch of natural science, and classic fields of study include the mechanics of objects, light and color, sound, electricity and magnetism, heat, waves, and celestial phenomena (physical phenomena).
In other words, of all the sciences created by human intelligence, physics is the most important academic field, directly linked to human happiness and life.

It goes without saying that it would be extremely difficult to even only survive in natural environment if we were to ignore our sense of physics in all our actions.

However, “Mathematics” is considered to be of utmost importance in the financial and economic society, by moving money financial economics is based on virtual calculations such as numbers and mathematical formulas, and the underlying numbers and mathematical formulas are also numbers and mathematical formulas of virtual calculations.
These numbers and mathematical formulas often produce results that are far removed from real-world physical phenomena and actual facts.
To take the most obvious example, if you fold a 1mm thick piece of newspaper even just only 42 times, it will become 380,000 kilometers thick, a distance that is enough to reach the moon. This impossible reality can be explained by quite simple mathematical formulas, but it is immediately obvious that it is absolutely impossible from an accurate physical perspective.

Needless to say, in the physical theory, no matter how thin and strong a thread is, the amount of thread that can be stretched to that distance and its strength obviously foolish to compare it to even such soft palp materials like newspaper.

However, it’s not that difficult to fold a newspaper about 10 times, and the thickness actually become as calculated. People have a desire to believe as basic instinct that the real physical results of such a small mathematical theory (hypothetical theory) will continue indefinitely, and people are attracted to hypothetical numbers that ignore physical elements such as mass and volume, and they apply impossible physical loads to things that are absolutely impossible in reality, aiming to achieve these physically impossible numbers, but at some point they reach a physical limit and end up making physically irreversible mistakes over and over again.

In recent years, with the development of virtual technologies such as digitalization, even if we know that a major failure or breakdown will inevitably occur physically, we are fascinated by the allure of the virtual world, ignore physical reality, and rush headlong into a major failure or breakdown and many of serious incidents or troubles has been occurred already.

Recent “The Physics” has been openly corrupted for the sake of economic convenience, destroying the natural environment and even endangering all life on Earth.

What follows is not a criticism, but the examples listed up as “simple questions” as for “how” and “reason why” the real physical theories that anyone can understand are openly distorted and manipulated by virtual reality (numbers from the financial society, figures of currency money, economic formulas, and its economic world).

1. The Nobel Prize in Physics for 2024 and 2025 have been awarded for the invention of a virtual structural design in an electronic virtual world, such those concepts that are definitely far different from the definition of physics. Anyone familiar with the “definition of physics” above will likely ask, simply, why? Perhaps is it because only left the last hope for growth for the industrial economy lies in virtual space but nothing else?

2. Basic physics clearly shows that climate change, global warming& its boiling are caused not by the CO2 emitted when things are burned, but by the increase in air pressure due to the massive generation of water vapor (moisture:H2O) gas produced when boiling water. So why is CO2 the sole target of criticism while spewing CO2 at same time while ignoring basic physics?

3. Natural plants, such as trees absorb large amounts of CO2 and convert it into oxygen to supply for all livings on earth, carbon shall be returned into soil in law of nature, so why destroy those trees and forests, and would try to work high-tech machines like CO2 capture systems while continuously spewing CO2 with ignoring basic physics and destroying law of nature?

4. Why is nuclear power generation, which produces the most water vapor, certified as “green energy” by the Conference of the Parties Worldwide (COP)? Isn’t this just to hide the fact that nuclear power plants, which simply do not emit CO2 during the combustion process, emit H2O (water vapor), which has a greater impact on climate change than CO2 while ignoring basic physics?

5. As for like a representative of regenerable clean energy source Solar Panel Generation System, certainly has great generating function with very thin and rational physical structure is very wonderful in science technologies. However, that wonderful feature has ruined all its merits by implementing at larger scale up to be able to generate higher instantaneous power as much as called Mega-Solar at same time. This is the same physical logic failure of the folding newspaper case, it is just causes only result of dangerous wastes remain in unnecessary and increasing unrecoverable damage, in which that has been proven in both physically and actual result. It is because if the electricity has been generated, it must be consumed in some kinds of application at same time or stored in a battery, otherwise it would be discharged into the air and nothing remain. In other words, it is self-evident from physics, otherwise that the considerable electricity generated by many of solar panels shall be used immediately or stored in a battery with appropriate storage capabilities, it would all be wasted. The high-output, unstable electricity generated by mega solar power plants cannot be consumed directly, so large-capacity storage batteries are required, but has anyone ever seen such storage batteries next to a vast array of solar panels? It is well known that the construction of mega solar power plants is destroying forests and many ecosystems created by the workings of nature over decades and centuries, that the materials used to make solar panels contain hazardous substances, that there is no economically rational recycling technology, and that solar panels are being illegally disposed of in the natural environment. Anyone with a knowledge of physics can see how dangerous this is, so why are the authorities in physics not saying anything?

6. As the world cries out about an “Energy Crisis“, high hopes are pinned on renewable energy sources like solar and wind power as a non-CO2 and alternative of thermal energy. The enormous costs for the manufacturing and construction are collected from ordinary people as an additional tax and surcharged electricity bill payment, and their the great generating capacity is publicly announced as adequate achievements for the costs. However, no information is made public about whether this electricity is being duly supplied, distributed, and consumed by ordinary people. Why is this not shown like hidden? In that while, in the point of view of physical perspective, it’s clear that there is no such thing as a physically stable, ultra-high-capacity/high-performance of energy exchange storage battery capable of storing the unstable, high-output electricity from such renewable energy systems. So, does this mean that all the scientists and physicists involved are “lying”? Or are they being forced to “lie”? Either way, since vast amounts of tax money and other funds are being spent on these “lies” or “SF technology“, doesn’t this show a criminal doubt for such flow of money?

7. In this day and age, the atomic bomb has been publicly described as a “cornerstone of peace” that helped end wars and prevented wars that would destroy humanity. However, historical evidence clearly shows that it was Oppenheimer, not Einstein, who physically perfected nuclear fission, and that the invention was the culmination of Oppenheimer’s extraordinary personal talent and life-or-death efforts to invent the “physical technology to generate nuclear reactions.” Despite Oppenheimer’s achievements, which deserve both the Nobel Prize in Physics and the Peace Prize, like Einstein, he remains inscribed in the history of science as the villain who perfected a deadly weapon. Therefore, some doubts remain as to whether the authority of physics has truly been exercised for the prosperity and peace of humanity.

8. In any case, Einstein, despite being condemned as the father of the atomic bomb, was given the authority of a god of physics. However, that authority disrupted his peaceful life and made him a tragic hero who died in agony. His merely science fictional interpretations were exaggerated, and mere dreams like time machines and time travel were deemed to have scientific basis. This contributed greatly to the development of the science fiction entertainment industry, and even his mere notes are traded at high prices. Meanwhile, Oppenheimer was treated like a guilty mad scientist, and no one acknowledged his true achievements. However, his core technology was quickly understood by leading physicists around the world, and the fact that nuclear bombs began to be manufactured around the world remains clear. In other words, while both men undoubtedly achieved great physical feats, it would be the time to fundamentally question what criteria have been used to evaluate science and technology to this day.

If one calls themselves a scientist who knows the definition of physics and can discuss its logic and reasoning, then it is self-evident that misinterpreting or turning a blind eye to real-world events and phenomena is a “sin” serious enough to create a “crisis of human survival”. Nevertheless, the fact that this sin is being openly committed today, is it a sign that we are indeed at the end of the civilization?

---